United States v. Monus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Michael Monus appeals from a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence “as if’ under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). Because defendant failed to make the requisite showing that an unconstitutional motive influenced the government’s decision not to move for a downward departure based upon Rule 35(b), we affirm the judgment of the district court.
*512The facts giving rise to the underlying prosecution have already been recited at some length by this court, see United States v. Monus, 128 F.3d 376, 381 (6th Cir.1997), and we will not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Michael I. MonusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Darrell EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jerry BagnoliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. StrohCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Small v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.