Legal Opinion

Erick Hallick v. Lauren Kelly

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 17, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00587Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ERICK HALLICK, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 25-cv-587-jdp LAUREN KELLY, Defendant. A federal statute, 11 U.S.C. § 349(b), provides that when a bankruptcy case is dismissed, some transfers of assets that occurred during those proceedings are vacated. Plaintiff Erick Hallick seeks a declaratory judgment that § 349(b) does not apply to an asset that he claims he owns. This case arises from a dispute between Hallick and a non-party, Michael Hull. Hallick won a $13.625-million judgment against Hull in state court. Hallick…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Macken v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Alarm Detection Systems, Incor v. Orland Fire Protection DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API