Erick Hallick v. Lauren Kelly
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ERICK HALLICK, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 25-cv-587-jdp LAUREN KELLY, Defendant. A federal statute, 11 U.S.C. § 349(b), provides that when a bankruptcy case is dismissed, some transfers of assets that occurred during those proceedings are vacated. Plaintiff Erick Hallick seeks a declaratory judgment that § 349(b) does not apply to an asset that he claims he owns. This case arises from a dispute between Hallick and a non-party, Michael Hull. Hallick won a $13.625-million judgment against Hull in state court. Hallick…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Macken v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Alarm Detection Systems, Incor v. Orland Fire Protection DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.