Scotch Lumber Co. v. Sage
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Clarke. Tried before the I-Ion. Trios. II. Smith. The hill in this case1; was filed by the appellee, Henry M. Sage, againsi the appellant, the Scotch "Lumber Company. The purpose of the bill is to partition the lands described in the bill. The complainant claims to own a 6-7 undivided interest, and allages that the defendant is the owner of a 1-7 undivided interest.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Clarke. Tried before the I-Ion. Trios. II. Smith. The hill in this case1; was filed by the appellee, Henry M. Sage, againsi the appellant, the Scotch "Lumber Company. The purpose of the bill is to partition the lands described in the bill. The complainant claims to own a 6-7 undivided interest, and allages that the defendant is the owner of a 1-7 undivided interest. The respondent, by answer, denies the ownership of the complainant of the said 6-7 undivided interest, and alleges that it not only owns the 1-7 undivided interest as alleged in the bill, but that…
1Opinion of the CourtTyson, J.
— The bill in this canse was filed for the partition of lands described in it between joint owners or tenants in common thereof. Complainant claims to be the owner of a six-sevenths undivided interest, in common with the respondent, whom the bill alleged to be the owner of the remaining one-seventh. The answer of respondent denies the ownership of the complainant as alleged by him, and states the resx)ecfcive interest or ownership of the lands to be a six-sevenths undivided interest to belong to it, and a one-seventh to belong to complainant. After the filing of this answer, complainant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frenkel v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Wells v. American Mortgage Co. of Scotland, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- McCarthy v. NicrosiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Johns v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Lehman, Durr & Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Co. v. Haley Furniture & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Girard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Croteau v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Lightsey v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Farnsworth v. HazelettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.