Legal Opinion

Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Collins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from Etowali Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. II. C. Speake. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBkickell, C. J.

The appellants, as judgment creditors-of William T. Shook, filed the original bill in this cause to compel a redemption and conveyance to them of certain real estate, situate in the town of Gadsden, which had been sold under a-power in a mortgage executed to Shook, and of which the respondent, now appellee, Conley, had become the purchaser. The bill avers that Conley “ pretends to have contracted with one Collins, who resides in the State of North Carolina, and whose Christian name is unknown to your orators, and can not *129be ascertained by them by diligent inquiry, for the sale of the original…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spoor v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  2. Wilburn & Co. v. McCalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Grigg v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Couthway v. BerghausSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. Brown v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Francis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Parmer v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Morrison v. FormbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API