Legal Opinion

Van Order v. Bailey

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Many of the issues raised by the pleadings have been solved in other litigation, by death and by the agreement of the parties, so that the only things presently sought is a construction of some features of the last will and testament of Daniel Bailey, deceased, and a decision as to the legality of the sale of a legatee's share.

The testator gave the residue of his estate to three executors in trust for twenty years and provided that upon the death of an executor the survivors should appoint a successor from among his grandchildren. He gave the executors power to bring the trust to an end "by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RowlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Hardenburgh v. BlairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879
  3. Bellows v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
  4. Bray v. General Engineering Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  5. Hodgson v. FarrellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Drinkhouse v. Birch Ranch & Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API