Legal Opinion

Hardenburgh v. Blair

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On bill for the construction of the will of Charles G. Sisson, deceased. On appeal from the decree of the chancellor, reported in Hardenburgh v. Blair, 3 Stew. 42.

1Opinion of the CourtDepue, J.

This bill was filed by the executors of Charles G-. Sisson, deceased, for the aid and direction of the court of chancery in the execution of the trusts declared in the above-quoted (p. 647) clause of the testator’s will.

The parties to the suit are Charles Q-. Sisson, Jr., one of the testator’s sons above named, Van Antwerp and Mabie, judgment creditors of the said Charles, and Blair, who was appointed receiver under supplementary proceedings had upon said judgment.

The net income of the fund set apart by the testator for his son Charles, is over $14,000 a year. Of this income the executors…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Hadden v. SpaderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
  3. Graff v. . BonnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Campbell v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Bramhall v. . FerrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. DwyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Moore v. MooreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Camden Trust Co. v. TooneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  4. Chelsea-Wheeler Coal Co. v. MarvinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  5. Fischer v. FischerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API