Legal Opinion

Briggs v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 25, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2014-000693; Opinion No. 27745PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE FEW:

This is a post-conviction relief (PCR) action. The PCR court granted relief and ordered a new trial. We affirm.

I. Procedural History

The State indicted Briggs for criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree and lewd act upon a child,1 and called the case to trial on August 23, 2010. The victim testified Briggs touched her “private” with his “private” and with his mouth, and the jury watched video of two forensic interviews in which the victim explained what happened. Using a special interrogatory verdict form, the jury found Briggs performed “anal intercourse,”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. KromahSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Branham v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  3. Jarrard v. MartellDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  4. Mangal v. Warden Perry Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. MakinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API