Legal Opinion

State v. Redfern

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 7119SC706PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether it was error for the trial court to allow the Solicitor to question the defendant, at some length, as to prior convictions.

At the trial defendant testified in his own behalf. On cross-examination the defendant testified that he had been convicted of assault, but that he did not know how many times. He was then questioned, at some length, about specific previous convictions dating to 1945.

*231The defendant contends that the State was bound by his answer that he had been convicted of assault, but he did not know how many times and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API