Legal Opinion

In re Factor VIII or IX Concentrate Blood Products Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 12, 1997No. MDL-986. No. 93 C 7452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GRADY, District Judge.

A discovery motion in this multidistrict litigation calls upon this court to interpret the italicized language in the concluding sentence of 28 U.S.C. § 1407(b):

The judge or judges to whom such actions are assigned, the members of the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation, and other circuit and district judges designated when needed by the panel may exercise the powers of a district judge in any district for the purpose of conducting pretrial depositions in such coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.

Plaintiffs in the litigation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pillsbury Co. v. ConboySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation-John W. CulyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. In re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of John Conboy, DeponentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, M.D.L. No. 310. Appeal of Phillip L. Fleischacker, DeponentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. VISX, Inc. v. Nidek Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. In Re Welding Rod Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API