Legal Opinion

Jones v. Sander

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1891No. 173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas Comity. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

— Appellee brought an action against a large number of defendants to restrain them from diverting the waters from "Wilson creek so as to prevent a certain flow therein through his land situated on said creek. Some of the defendants, by way of answer, set up a claim to certain water of said creek, and asked that it be decreed to them. Upon the trial of the cause the question of the rights of the respective parties as to the waters of such creek were gone into, and the decree of the court established the same, not only as between each of such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cline v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Nelson v. Territory of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cadwell v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cornell University v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Haberman v. SanderWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bellingham Bay National Bank v. Central Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API