Legal Opinion

Haberman v. Sander

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1932No. 23403. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This litigation involves the waters of Wilson creek, located in Kittitas county, and is one phase of a legal battle which has been waged intermittently for over forty years over the waters of that rather inadequate stream. Wilson and Nanum creeks rise in the mountains north of the city of Ellensburg, and flow in a generally southerly direction to a point where they unite and form one stream for more than a mile, when they separate at a place known as “The Forks,” from which point Nanum creek flows southeasterly and Wilson creek southwesterly. The waters of both creeks have long been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. White Bros. v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Crook v. HewittWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Sander v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. East Bench Irr. Co. v. Deseret Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Provo Bench Canal and Irrigation Co. v. LinkeUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lawrence v. SanderWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. East Bench Irr. Co. v. Deseret Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API