Legal Opinion

Burr v. City & Cty. of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1921No. S. F. No. 9470PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In the court below judgment was given in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The object of the plaintiff’s action was to recover of the city and county of San Francisco the sum of $462.60, paid as taxes upon the property of the plaintiff’s testator for the year 1914 undér protest, which tax, it is alleged, was unlawfully levied by the city, in violation of the provisions of section 11, chapter 1, of article III of the city charter, limiting the annual tax rate to one dollar on each one hundred dollars of the assessed valuation of property.

Section 11 aforesaid provides…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. Lee WahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. County of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Verreos v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Spreckels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API