Legal Opinion

Armstrong Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1955No. Appeal, No. 241PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review holding him disqualified for benefits .under section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation LaAV, 43 PS §802, which provides, inter alia: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week— ... (e) *489In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with his work; . . .”

Claimant was employed by the Snyder Manufacturing Company, Philadelphia, as a maintenance carpenter, at $1.96 per hour. His working hours…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Morgan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. American Bag & Paper Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Cecchini Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Druzak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API