Druzak v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
From May until November 18, 1972 appellant was employed as a sales person and assistant manager of a retail store in the Neshaminy Shopping Mall, Corn-wells Heights, Pa. When she was employed she was told, according to her own testimony, that she was to work “Approximately a 40 hour week. Either 10 to 6 or 1 to 9:30.” The evidence indicates she usually worked 3 days on the 1 to 9:30 schedule and 2 days on the 10 to 6. She had y2 hour off for lunch. She was paid $85.00 a week to start and received a $10.00 a week raise during the period, making $95.00 a week at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Harmer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Harbutz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Armstrong Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Burke Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tucker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Sturniolo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. WaltonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- National Aluminum Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.