Legal Opinion

Druzak v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1036 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

From May until November 18, 1972 appellant was employed as a sales person and assistant manager of a retail store in the Neshaminy Shopping Mall, Corn-wells Heights, Pa. When she was employed she was told, according to her own testimony, that she was to work “Approximately a 40 hour week. Either 10 to 6 or 1 to 9:30.” The evidence indicates she usually worked 3 days on the 1 to 9:30 schedule and 2 days on the 10 to 6. She had y2 hour off for lunch. She was paid $85.00 a week to start and received a $10.00 a week raise during the period, making $95.00 a week at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Harmer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Harbutz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Armstrong Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Burke Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Tucker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Sturniolo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. WaltonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. National Aluminum Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API