Legal Opinion

United States v. Kosek

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1994No. Misc. Dkt. No. 93-23PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SNYDER, Senior Judge:

The United States has filed a timely appeal pursuant to Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (1988), asserting the military judge erroneously excluded evidence in this case. Upon review of the parties’ very able briefs, and the record, we conclude the military judge erred and reverse.

I. FACTS

The military judge determined the essential facts as follows:

1. By 4 June 1993 OSI Special Agents [D] and [M] learned from the accused’s roommate that the accused was possibly *985using cocaine, that he had taken the train to New York City to obtain cocaine and that he…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KosekUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. KosekUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API