United States v. Stephen Michael Saniti
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Saniti was convicted of bank robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We affirm.
Relying upon Hawkins v. United States, 358 U.S. 74, 79 S.Ct. 136, 3 L.Ed.2d 125 (1958), Saniti contends that the district court committed reversible error when it compelled his wife to testify against him. Even assuming the legal issue was properly raised in this case, there is a narrow exception to the husband-wife privilege when the marriage is not entered into in good faith. See Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 73 S.Ct. 481, 97 L.Ed. 593 (1953); United States v. Mathis, 559 F.2d 294, 298 (5th Cir. 1977).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Western Laundry & Linen Rental Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Michael and Janet FalleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Anthony LapierreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MacDonald Julius JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.