Legal Opinion

Knight v. Kansas Compensation Board

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1933No. 30,920Published

1Opinion of the Court

*506The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to compel payment of compensation to plaintiff as a Kansas soldier during the world war.

The compensation board rejected plaintiff’s claim, and on appeal the trial court sustained its ruling, predicated on the following finding of fact:

“The plaintiff, Phillip S. Knight; was bom in Leavenworth, Kan., about 1887, and lived with his mother in Leavenworth, Kan., until about August, 1914, when he went to Kansas City, Mo., where he lived until he entered the service in May, 1917.
“The plaintiff enlisted in the army of the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Soldiers' Compensation AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Baldwin v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. In re Soldiers' Compensation AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Knuth v. Kansas Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Parrish v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API