Legal Opinion
In re Soldiers' Compensation Appeals
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 1, 1924No. Nos. 25,550, 25,552, 25,566, 25,636, 25,638, 25,639, 25,640, 25,641, 25,648, 25,674, 25,682, 25,683, 25,687, 25,688, 25,690, 25,692, 25,714, 25,719, 25,736, 25,742, 25,765, 25,796, 25,804, 25,827, 25,836, 25,853, and 25,863PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam — Dawson, J.:
Decisions in these and other soldiers’ compensation appeals were announced as the court was about to adjourn in July. {Ante, p. 601, 227 Pac. 1117.) The number and variety of the questions then presented made it impractical to write a formal opinion without delaying the decisions and consequently retarding the official business of the compensation board.
Turning now with more time at our command to review our summary despatch of these cases, the court is inclined to hold that little more needs to be written. In Horvat v. Davis, No. 25,550, and similar cases, it should…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Griffith v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Dew v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baldwin v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Richardson v. Kansas Soldiers Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Seigle v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Beamer v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Dellinger v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.