Legal Opinion
Nexans Wires S.A. v. Sark-USA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 25, 2004No. 03 CIV. 2291(MGC)PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Defendants Sark-USA, Inc. (“Sark-USA”) and Sarkuysan Elektrolitik Bakir Sanayii Ve Ticaret A.S. (“Sarkuysan”) have moved to dismiss this action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). Specifically, defendants contend that plaintiffs Nexans Wires S.A. (“Nexans”) and Lacroix & Kress GmbH (“L & K”) lack standing to sue under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030. By order of October 16, 2003, defendants’ motion to dismiss was converted into a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs were directed to submit the facts upon which they rely for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- P.C. Yonkers, Inc. v. Celebrations the Party & Seasonal Superstore, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. SandhuDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Liveperson, Inc. v. 24/7 Customer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Nexans Wires S.A. v. Sark-USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Fink v. Time Warner CableDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.