Seagrave Corp. v. Mount Spain v. Mount
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentAllen, Circuit Judge
I regret that I cannot agree with my brothers. While Fyr-Fyter has a smaller invested capital than Seagrave it has made money much faster than Seagrave and paid dividends more steadily over a period of years. It has outstanding 20,-000 shares of preferred stock and the record shows that all dividends are fully paid and not in arrears. Seagrave paid no dividends from 1941 through 1947 and in recent years it has paid dividends in an amount greater than its net earnings.
The invested capital of Seagrave is over four times that of Fyr-Fyter but during the period involved Fyr-Fyter earned more than…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- United States Steel Corp. v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.