Legal Opinion

People v. Gatlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1946No. Crim. 4001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of grand theft, after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), and pursuant to the rules set forth in People v. Pianezzi, 42 Cal.App.2d 265, 269 [108 P.2d 732], the essential facts are:

At about noon on September 19, 1945, the complaining witness, Mr. Gabriel, cashed two liberty bonds and two pay checks at the Security First National Bank in San Pedro. He then started toward the postoffice and at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. HennesseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. SantoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. People v. PostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API