Cargitlada v. Binks Manufacturing Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
TODD, J.:
¶ 1 Sergio Cargitlada appeals the November 26, 2002 order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas granting Appellee ITW Industrial Finishing’s (“ITW”) motion to strike, and removing ITW as a party to the instant action. Upon review, we reverse and remand.
¶ 2 On May 6, 1997, Appellant was injured while using a commercial spray-paint gun manufactured by Binks Manufacturing Company (“Binks”). His injuries required the amputation of one of his fingers. On August 25, 1999, Appellant filed a products liability action against Binks and Binks Sames Company (“Binks Sames”)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Tri State Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Estate of McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Whatley v. BaynardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. KrystkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Aquilino v. Philadelphia Catholic ArchdioceseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Vogt v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. KrystkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Citizens Bank of PA. v. Rim, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.