Legal Opinion

Cargitlada v. Binks Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TODD, J.:

¶ 1 Sergio Cargitlada appeals the November 26, 2002 order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas granting Appellee ITW Industrial Finishing’s (“ITW”) motion to strike, and removing ITW as a party to the instant action. Upon review, we reverse and remand.

¶ 2 On May 6, 1997, Appellant was injured while using a commercial spray-paint gun manufactured by Binks Manufacturing Company (“Binks”). His injuries required the amputation of one of his fingers. On August 25, 1999, Appellant filed a products liability action against Binks and Binks Sames Company (“Binks Sames”)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Tri State Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. In Re Estate of McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Whatley v. BaynardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. KrystkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Aquilino v. Philadelphia Catholic ArchdioceseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Vogt v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. KrystkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Citizens Bank of PA. v. Rim, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API