Whatley v. Baynard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Cubiam,
This is an appeal from an order entered below striking from the record a judgment of non pros, in an action seeking damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident.
In striking the judgment, the court took into consideration facts outside the record. This was error. A motion to strike off a judgment of non pros., regular on its face, challenges only defects appearing on the face of the record. Cox v. Felice Perri & Sons, 412 Pa. 415, 195 A. 2d 79 (1963). However, since the facts which moved the learned court below to strike the judgment appear to have sufficient merit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mazer v. Sargent Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Cox v. Felice Perri & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goldstein v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Saint Vladimir Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re Estate of McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kophazy v. KophazySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Cargitlada v. Binks Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.