Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Hobart Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1993No. 61622, 61623PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Hobart Corporation, appeals from the judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of plaintiff, Curtis Palmer, on a strict liability failure to warn claim. Defendant, Donald 0. Schnuck, d/b/a D & E Leasing Company, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Hobart Corporation on its cross-claim for attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses incurred in defending the products liability action. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, established that plaintiff was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Fahy v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Hanover Ltd. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. Owens & Minor, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cole v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Johnson v. Medtronic, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Gould Electronics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API