Legal Opinion

Syverson, Rath & Mehrer, P.C. v. Peterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1993No. Civ. 920091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

The accounting firm of Syverson, Rath, and Mehrer, P.C. (Syverson) appeals a judgment for the State Auditor. The judgment ruled that NDCC 54-10-14 constitutionally authorized the State Auditor to charge a fee to a public accountant who audits a political subdivision “for the related costs of reviewing the audit report.” We affirm.

Until 1967, the State Auditor audited state agencies but not the political subdivisions of the State. NDCC 54-10-01(2). The 1967 North Dakota Legislature directed the State Auditor to audit the political subdivisions, as well, transferring that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Southern Valley Grain Dealers Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ralston Purina Company v. HagemeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Schwanda v. BonneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Independent Bankers Ass'n of Georgia, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelsh v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Burleigh County Water Resource District v. Burleigh County of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. RigginNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API