Legal Opinion
United States v. Sean Timothy Doran
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1969No. 23368_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm.
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the order to report for induction was invalid because it was signed by the local board clerk and there was no evidence that the local board actually selected and ordered the defendant to report for induction in accordance with Selective Service Regulation 32 C.F.R. § 1631.7 *
In United States v. Baker, 416 F.2d 202 (9th Cir. Sept. 17, 1969), this court dealt with a virtually identical argument. We pointed out that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Dennis Adrian BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Lloyd Odin LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Ernest Douglas Brede v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States Ex Rel. Bergdoll v. DrumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robert Cloyd Rusk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Alfred Loren WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. John Carl Hulphers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Dalton Earl WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. George Michael WeldonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.