Ernest Douglas Brede v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioning for rehearing, the United States specifically disputes two statements made in our opinion:
1. “* * * section [1660.20(d)] requires the local board, after receiving such authorization, to meet and order the appellant to report for such civilian work.”
The United States contends that § 1660.20(d) does not require that a meeting be held after receipt of authorization ; that an order to report could be entered prior to authorization but subject to subsequent authorization and notice.
We agree. In this respect our opinion is modified by striking “after receiving such authorization.”
2. “At…
2Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Dennis Adrian BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. John William PowersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Charles Douglas ChaudronCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. BeltranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
- United States v. MacHadoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.