Legal Opinion

Weale v. Lund

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 7, 2006No. 05-365PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendants, David and Isabel Lund,1 appeal from the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, William Weale, to foreclose plaintiff’s judgment lien against defendants’ property. Defendants claim the debt on which plaintiff seeks to recover through foreclosure is not a preexisting cause of action, and is thus subject to defendants’ homestead exemption under 27 V.S.A. § 107, because the debt was not in default at the time defendants acquired their homestead. As such, defendants argue that their homestead property is exempt from foreclosure under 27 V.S.A. § 101. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Burlington Electric Department v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. In Re South Burlington-Shelburne Highway ProjectSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re 204 North Avenue NOV (Pierre Gingue, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. Nelson v. Town of St. Johnsbury, LaMotte, Oddy, Ruggles, Rust, Timson and Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. In Re BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Benson v. MVP Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API