Legal Opinion

Neal v. Wilmington & New Castle Electric Railway Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 13, 1902No. Action on the Case No. 52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, J.,

charging the jury:

Gentlemen of the jury:—In this case the plaintiff, William H. Neal, administrator of Harry Neal, deceased, seeks to recover from the defendant, the Wilmington and New Castle Electric Railway Company, damages for the death of said Harry Neal; which death was caused, the plaintiff alleges, by the negligence of the defendant company.

It is averred by the plaintiff that a guy wire that was connected with and formed a part of the defendant’s railway, and which served to hold the main trolley wire in position, was on the morning of November 26, 1900, found to be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BakerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. The SaginawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905
  3. Gismondi v. Peoples Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API