Legal Opinion

State v. Kragt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 2018No. A163964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

*170Defendant appeals two amended judgments that were entered in this criminal case. He assigns error to the trial court's entry of those judgments without notice to defendant, without a hearing, and without obtaining a waiver of any kind from defendant. We vacate and remand.

A judgment convicting defendant of three counts of first-degree sodomy and imposing sentences on those counts was entered in 1999. That judgment imposed a single term of post-prison supervision (PPS) and $5,400 in restitution. In 2014, the trial court entered an amended judgment, which is not at issue in this appeal. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KragtOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. KragtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API