Legal Opinion
Ide v. Joe Miller & Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1984No. 83CA0490PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
John and Dora Ide, buyers, brought an action against Joe Miller and Co., seller, for specific performance and abatement of the purchase price of a farm. The dispute arose when a well on the property was determined to have the capacity to pump 115 gallons per minute instead of 350 gallons as specified in the contract of sale. The trial court ordered an abatement in the purchase price of $92,000 to approximately $55,000 based on testimony that the value of the increment of additional water — 235 gallons per minute — was $37,000. However, the buyers own appraiser testified that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Charles Ilfeld Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Dlug v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Kuper v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Emery v. Medal Building CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Barnes v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Keith v. El-KarehColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Smith v. SellersColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Monus v. Colorado Baseball 1993, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.