Legal Opinion

Eastern Freight Ways, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 20, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK VAN PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Defendant United States moved for-summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C., on the ground; that the action is barred by the six year-statute of limitations contained in the-Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a). Subsequent to the argument of the motion-the Government raised an additional *23ground for summary judgment, asserting that in view of dieta in footnotes in United States v. Western Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 59, 77 S.Ct. 161, 1 L.Ed.2d 126, and United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 352 U.S. 77, 77 S.Ct. 172, 1 L.Ed.2d 140,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Illinois Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northern Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Eastern Freight Ways, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. United States v. De Queen & Eastern RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API