Legal Opinion

Cremo Light Co. v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Frank M. Parker, as attorney in fact, etc., from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in tire office of the clerk of tire county of New York on the 22d day of December, 1906, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

The action is upon a fire policy in the standard form, with the addition of the necessary clauses to fit its character as a Lloyd’s policy. The defendant appeals from a judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The Assurance Lloyds of America *846insured “ Cremo Incandescent Light Company, as now' or may be hereafter constituted.” It contained the usual clause that the policy should be void “If any change, other than by the death of an insured, takes place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Loeb v. Firemen's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Bowling v. Continental InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. White v. Maryland Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. One Beacon Insurance v. Old Williamsburg Candle Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API