Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Continental Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1920PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certified Questions from Circuit Court, Summers County. Action by W. P. Bowling, receiver, etc., against the Continefi-tal Insurance Company. Demurrer to declaration overruled, and question certified.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

The declaration held sufficient on demurrer and certified here substantially presents the following case for adjudication: The Hinton Hardware Company, a corporation engaged in a wholesale and retail hardware business in the City of Hinton, procured from defendant February 8, 1915, a three-year policy of insurance, against damage or destruction by fire on a two-story metal roof frame building in Hinton in which it conducted such business. Sometime in the month of August of that year the directors and stockholders decided to and by a resolution did effect a reorganization of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Keeney v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Tucker v. Colonial Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. City Bank of Wheeling v. BryanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Walradt v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Thompson v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Collins v. New York Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Shinn v. West Virginia InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Central Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API