Legal Opinion

Hale v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice CeesON

The instant case is before us on appeal from the Circuit Court of Roane County. Our jurisdiction is directly invoked to determine the present controversy since the facts have been stipulated below.

In this opinion the parties will be designated by their adversary status in the trial court; that is, Barry Hale and Wallace Hale, as plaintiffs, and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, as defendants.

The plaintiffs in the instant case filed declarations seeking to recover for alleged breaches of insurance contracts by defendants. The declarations of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lindsay v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sexton v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Pearthree v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Stewart v. University of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Moorcroft v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Crumley v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API