Legal Opinion
In Re Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury Numbered S286-4-7
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 6, 1986No. S86-126, S86-127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on motions to quash two subpoenae duces tecum issued by the grand jury. Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure authorizes the court to entertain the motion. The grand jury’s subpoenae seek certain business records dating back to July 1, 1982. The subpoenae demand, “All documents relating to [two named corporations] for the period July 1, 1982 to the present. These documents include, but are not limited to, the following ...” The subpoenae then describe ten specific categories of documents. The motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. HermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. George H. Alewelt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. John E. Gurule, and Harold K. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re August, 1993 Regular Grand JuryDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1990
- United States v. TroppDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1989