Legal Opinion

United States v. Tropp

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided November 16, 1989No. CR89-104-KPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE AND RETURN OF PROPERTY (WITH FINDINGS)

KERR, District Judge.

The above-entitled matter having come on regularly for hearing before the Court on defendant’s motions for suppression of evidence and return of property; plaintiff appearing by and through its attorney, Gay V. Woodhouse, Special Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Wyoming; defendant appearing by and through his attorneys, Craig E. Kirkwood and Donald Fritzen; and the Court having heard the arguments of counsel and having fully and carefully reviewed and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Paul WalasekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Kleen Laundry & Cleaners, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  5. Ernest Lindberg Edmondson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API