Wright v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Gregory L. Wright challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for Theft, as a Class D felony.
We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part, with instructions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 11, 1999, Wal-Mart loss prevention officers Randall Smith, John Mul-heran, and Margaret Bickle observed Wright enter the Carmel Wal-Mart store carrying two bags of clothing. The officers watched as Wright placed the bags of clothing on a counter at the service desk, took an empty shopping cart, and proceeded to the housewares…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Madison County Bank & Trust Co. v. KreegarIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Camden v. Gibson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Chambliss v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gregory Leonard Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003