Legal Opinion

Chambliss v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2001No. 49S00-9908-CR-438PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Quantel Chambliss shot two store employees in a struggle after they tried to apprehend him shoplifting. In the course of affirming his convictions and sentence, we find that his handgun's serial number had been sufficiently altered to constitute a eriminal offense. We also conclude that because the jury convicted him of theft, he suffered no prejudice when his lawyers did not ask the jury to be instructed on the defenses of self defense or accident.

Background

The facts most favorable to the verdict indicate that on June 4, 1998, Defendant entered the 7-11 Grocery…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jordan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Love v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Laughner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Woodford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Dillard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API