Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 12, 1959No. Civ. No. 9433PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against the United States under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (2), to recover $9,999.99.1 Plaintiff claims this amount as compensation for extra work done for the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of Interior, under Contract No. 12r-19806.
Plaintiff completed his contract for enlarging and improving the Lost River channel in Oregon. The river channel between stations 375 and 274 required reconstruction to a centerline ten feet to the right or east of the centerline of the old channel.
From station 375 to station 370, plaintiff used two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Farwell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kayfield Construction Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Allied Paint & Color Works, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- M. Berger Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Union Painting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1961