Legal Opinion

Allied Paint & Color Works, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 24, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacMAHON, District Judge.

The government moves, pursuant to a pretrial order of the court, for an order precluding the taking of testimony and directing that the scope of judicial review be limited to consideration of whether the decision by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in this case was supported by substantial evidence and was correct in matters of law.

Plaintiff contracted with the United States Navy to furnish it with a specified number of paint kits. The Navy was to furnish a sufficient quantity of phosphorescent paint to be used as a component in the kits. The contract (No.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Hamden Co-Operative Creamery Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  2. McKinnon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allied Paint & Color Works, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. M. Berger Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API