Legal Opinion
Baughn v. Eli Lilly and Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 4, 2005No. CIV.A.03-2626-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YRATIL, District Judge.
Barbara and Derek Baughn filed this product liability action against Eli Lilly and Company. Plaintiffs allege that Barbara Baughn suffered injuries because her mother took diethylstilbestrol (“DES”), a prescription drug, during her pregnancy with Barbara in 1964 and 1965. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Eli Lilly And Company’s Renewed Motion For Summary Judgment On Statute Of Repose Grounds (Doc. # 55) filed November 12, 2004. For reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is overruled.
Summary Judgment Standards
Summary judgment is…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SEPTA v. Orrstown Financial Services InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Kramer v. Textron Aviation, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022