Legal Opinion
Taco Bell Corp. v. Costanza
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 22, 1997No. 96-2302PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
686 So.2d 773 (1997)
TACO BELL CORPORATION, Valenti Associates, Inc., and Tenga Taco, Inc., corporate successor to Valenti Southeast, Inc., Appellants,
v.
Sharon COSTANZA, Appellee.
No. 96-2302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
January 22, 1997.
Nancy W. Gregoire of Bunnell, Woulfe, Kirschbaum, Keller & McIntyre, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Mark A. Rutledge, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.
No appearance for appellee.
2Per curiam
Reversed and remanded for the trial court to enter an order dismissing appellants from the suit for non-compliance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(i). See…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Toby J. Espinoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Morales v. Sperry Rand Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Hernandez v. PageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Greco v. PedersenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(J)—Time Limit for ServiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Meadows of Citrus County, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Patterson v. LoewensteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Porolniczak v. ItkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997