Legal Opinion

Urdiales v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 18, 2009No. 04-08-00546-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

On appeal, Michael Urdíales asserts that the criminal statute that proscribes “racing on a highway” is unconstitutionally vague because it can be applied to the innocent conduct of mere passing on a highway. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.420(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2008). Specifically, Urd-íales challenges the portion of the statute defining the type of “racing” with which he was charged: using one or more vehicles in an attempt to “outgain or outdistance another vehicle.” See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.420(b)(2)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2008). Because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anthony Joseph Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  2. Anthony Joseph Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. Anthony Joseph Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  4. Felipe Lee Rosales v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
  5. Ricke Sony v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API