Urdiales v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.
On appeal, Michael Urdíales asserts that the criminal statute that proscribes “racing on a highway” is unconstitutionally vague because it can be applied to the innocent conduct of mere passing on a highway. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.420(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2008). Specifically, Urd-íales challenges the portion of the statute defining the type of “racing” with which he was charged: using one or more vehicles in an attempt to “outgain or outdistance another vehicle.” See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.420(b)(2)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2008). Because…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anthony Joseph Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Anthony Joseph Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Anthony Joseph Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Felipe Lee Rosales v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
- Ricke Sony v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.