Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald Timms

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2012No. 11-6886, 11-6941PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge MOTZ concurred.

OPINION

AGEE, Circuit Judge:

The Government appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina dismissing the Government’s action to civilly commit Gerald Wayne Timms as a “sexually dangerous person” under 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (“§ 4248” or “the statute”). The district court held that the statute, as applied to Timms, violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson PiperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Walter WoodenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Frederick SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. YoungsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Vernon WoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API