Legal Opinion

Isham v. Cudlip

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 1962No. Gen. 11,519PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants-appellants Mary Cudlip and Marion Rublaitus from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee Mae Isham in a suit for replevin of a five room frame dwelling located in an area known as Piety Hill, R. R. #1, Oglesby, Illinois. The judgment was that the plaintiff have and retain the property replevined, and for costs. The cause was heard by the court without a jury.

The amended complaint alleged that the plaintiff had been in possession and occupancy of the dwelling from 1917 until the present and that the dwelling is owned by the plaintiff; tbe land…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bauske v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. O'Connell v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Rude v. SeibertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. Hunsley v. ValterIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kozasa v. Guardian Electric Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. North Shore Sign Co. v. Signature Design Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. PaluchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Brehm v. Sargent & LundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Crittendon v. State Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API