Legal Opinion

Fred Sykes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1965No. 17659_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Fred Sykes and his co-defendant, Thomas J. Ruffin, were found guilty of unlawful concealment of heroin in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. § 174. The judgment of conviction was affirmed. Sykes v. United States, 312 F.2d 232 (8 Cir. 1963).

Sykes now seeks a review of the order of the District Court denying his motion to vacate the sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The numerous grounds alleged in support of the motion were carefully considered by the Court as shown by its unreported memorandum opinion.

Appellant has abandoned all but two of the grounds alleged in his motion, namely, (1) that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judson Edgar Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Fred Sykes v. United States of America, Thomas Ruffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Lester E. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. James B. Crismon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Louis A. Derringer and Gerald D. Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Clyde L. Hardy and Lee Roy Ferguson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Joseph Michael Lacaze, and Douglas Arceneaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API