Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Mizzelle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

There was dispute as to who were entitled to certain funds in the hands of N. B. Marriner, administrator of the estate of H. W. Mizzelle. The administrator urges “the right of this trustee to claim the consideration of the court and have his duty outlined.” We think the allegation of the administrator comes within the rule entitling him to advice.

In Freeman v. Cook, 41 N. C., 373 (378), Nash, J., said: “The chancellor is the only safe and secure counsellor to trustees.” The same principle applies to executors and administrators. Bank v. Alexander, 188 N. C., 667.

The question involved: Where…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Freeman v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  3. Moore v. . RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Skinner v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
  5. Ellis v. Harrison.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of IvesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. In Re Estate of PoindexterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Nixon v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API