Ohlquist v. Nordstrom
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMacGregor, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff against the defendants as joint tort feasors. A judgment was rendered against both. The judgment was affirmed upon appeal. The defendant Hickman has paid the judgment and now seeks to recover judgment against the defendant Nordstrom for one-half of the judgment. He seeks to do this by means of a motion pursuant to the provisions of section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act which provides: “ Such recovery may be had in a separate [‘action; or where the parties have appeared in the original action, a judgment may…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Creighton v. KerrSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Deuscher v. CammeranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hendry v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Haskell v. HaskellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Rapp v. CansdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Fernberg v. FernbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Brous v. Van OstrandNew York Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.