Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Haskell
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
Several years after the entry of a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an annulment action awarding the sum of $30 per week for the support of the son of the parties, she procured an order directing the entry of a judgment for arrears. The order to show cause on the application for such latter judgment provided for service upon the defendant, a resident of Connecticut, or his attorney.
Service was effected on the defendant’s attorney of record in the annulment action. Said attorney did not move under the provisions of section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act but merely submitted an affidavit “ in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Karlin v. KarlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Karpf v. KarpfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Durlacher v. DurlacherNew York Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gunsburg v. GunsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Holloway v. HollowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- EB v. EFBNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Eichelburg v. EichelburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.